Independent/ Christopher
Walken Election
Discussion or Essay Questions
The benefits
of having a long, drawn out election season are endless. Citizens have
time to improve upon their opinions of the candidates.
Candidates themselves need the time to prepare speeches, campaigns,
and their own political views. We could always have elections that
last one month and be over with it, but then our government wouldn't
have a swift, orderly change. Although shorter election seasons mean
less tax money, how good of a president could we expect? Our country
needs to keep its standards at a high minimum in order to ensure
stability within our government.
Nathan N. The US election season being two years long is a
positive aspect of American democracy. Two years is the perfect amount
of time for voters to decided who they want to vote for. It also allows
candidates enough time to get there message out to the people. This also
helps both candidates and voters so that candidates can go all around
the US and not just select cities and voters because more people will
have the chance to see the candidates and there opinions. Since more
voters get to here the candidates opinions they can vote more accurately
to what they think the country needs.\ Stephanie O. Though the election season lasts almost two years, it is a positive aspect of the election season. Society has the ability, over the course of two years, to shape their opinion about the presidential candidates and what they stand for. The endless commercials played continuously for the two years are fairly beneficial for the voters because they address the issues the candidates are concerned about and willing to take care of if elected president. Thus, the two year election season is important for the American society. Lani H. The election season being two
years long has both positive and negative aspects to it. In a
positive light, two years is definitely long enough to get to know a
candidate well. These two years give the voters plenty of time
to really get a better feel for the different candidates and where they
stand on certain issues. This time is certainly useful for
possible voters who do not only vote for certain political parties all
of the time (the type of people who want to see a good president
running our country, not just some liberal or conservative
running it). Email
your answers. They will be posted pending editorial review. Only
well-stated, appropriate responses will be considered. Really Cool Check out the Election pages
for the following past elections George Cassutto's Cyberlearning World: [Lesson
Plan of the Day] [Cassutto
Memorial] [About
the Author] [Search] [Civics Lesson
Plans]
Official Campaign Websites
Democratic Candidates
For President
Hillary Clinton
Barack
Obama
John
Edwards
Bill
Richardson
Joe Biden
Chris
Dodd
Mike
Gravel
Dennis
Kucinich
Republican Candidates
For President
Rudy
Giuliani
Sam Brownback
(Out of the race)
Mike
Huckabee
Duncan
Hunter
John
McCain
Mitt
Romney
Tommy
Thompson
(Out of the race)
Ron
Paul
Tom
Tancredo
Fred
Thompson
(Requires account)
Unaffiliated
Candidates
Stephen
Colbert
(No appropriate website has yet to emerge)
1. The US
election season is almost two years long. Is this a positive or negative
aspect of American democracy?
~Jeremy D.
I feel that this is a positive aspect of American Democracy. To only
give a short amount of time, say two months, is not enough time for
citizens to know and understand each candidate. I know for me
personally, I couldn't even start to know enough about each
candidate and their individual views on each issue facing the United
States today in only two months. Some may say that it is negative
only because it drags out for so long, but I feel that the longer
you have to get to know the candidates, the more you can base your
vote on being educated, rather than picking that person because you
like their tie. Democracy as a whole, shouldn't be rushed. You would
want the American people to know who they are electing as their next
President, am i wrong? So i feel that the length of the election
season is a good amount. It allows the American people to have time
to get to know each candidate, and it doesn't drag on for four
years.
On the other hand, two years of campaigning takes a lot of money
that most Americans do not have. This negative aspect certainly
makes it so the best candidates out there will not even have a
chance at running. The guy down the street could be the best
president the world has ever seen, but working 50 hour work weeks
as a forklift operator does not allow enough time or enough
money for any sort of presidential run.
Ultimately, the two years is positive because by the time election day
comes around, voters will really have great background information on all
of the candidates which will allow them to make the best possible
decision in their minds.
Election Resources
1996
http://www.cyberlearning-world.com